Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Construction and Engineering
Real Estate
Real Estate Services
Health Care Distribution and Services
Investment Banking and Brokerage
Independent Power Producers and Energy Traders
Environmental Services
Exposures
Ease
Express intent
Intelligence
Rights
Cooperate
Military
Political reform
Provide
Regime
Event Codes
Acknowledge responsibility
Reward
Endorse
Agree
Demonstrate
Yield to order
Human death
Promise
Force
Pessimistic comment
Solicit support
Adjust
Sports contest
Host meeting
Seize
Warn
Comment
Reject
Demand
Promise policy support
Reduce routine activity
Physical assault
Rally support
Military blockade
Grant
Sanction
Threaten
Decline comment
Wiki Wiki Summary
Shareholder A shareholder (in the United States often referred to as stockholder) of a corporation is an individual or legal entity (such as another corporation, a body politic, a trust or partnership) that is registered by the corporation as the legal owner of shares of the share capital of a public or private corporation. Shareholders may be referred to as members of a corporation.
Equity (finance) In finance, equity is ownership of assets that may have debts or other liabilities attached to them. Equity is measured for accounting purposes by subtracting liabilities from the value of the assets.
Stockholder of record Stockholder of record is the name of an individual or entity shareholder that an issuer carries in its shareholder register as the registered holder (not necessarily the beneficial owner) of the issuer's securities. Dividends and other distributions are paid only to shareholders of record.
Annual general meeting An annual general meeting (AGM, also known as the annual meeting) is a meeting of the general membership of an organization.\nThese organizations include membership associations and companies with shareholders.
Public company A public company, publicly traded company, publicly held company, publicly listed company, or public limited company is a company whose ownership is organized via shares of stock which are intended to be freely traded on a stock exchange or in over-the-counter markets. A public (publicly traded) company can be listed on a stock exchange (listed company), which facilitates the trade of shares, or not (unlisted public company).
Derivative suit A shareholder derivative suit is a lawsuit brought by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation against a third party. Often, the third party is an insider of the corporation, such as an executive officer or director.
Good Friday Agreement The Good Friday Agreement (GFA), or Belfast Agreement (Irish: Comhaontú Aoine an Chéasta or Comhaontú Bhéal Feirste; Ulster-Scots: Guid Friday Greeance or Bilfawst Greeance), is a pair of agreements signed on 10 April 1998 that ended most of the violence of the Troubles, a political conflict in Northern Ireland that had ensued since the late 1960s. It was a major development in the Northern Ireland peace process of the 1990s.
Prenuptial agreement A prenuptial agreement, antenuptial agreement, or premarital agreement (commonly referred to as a prenup), is a written contract entered into by a couple prior to marriage or a civil union that enables them to select and control many of the legal rights they acquire upon marrying, and what happens when their marriage eventually ends by death or divorce. Couples enter into a written prenuptial agreement to supersede many of the default marital laws that would otherwise apply in the event of divorce, such as the laws that govern the division of property, retirement benefits, savings, and the right to seek alimony (spousal support) with agreed-upon terms that provide certainty and clarify their marital rights.
TRIPS Agreement The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is an international legal agreement between all the member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). It establishes minimum standards for the regulation by national governments of different forms of intellectual property (IP) as applied to nationals of other WTO member nations.
Adverse possession Adverse possession, sometimes colloquially described as "squatter's rights", is a legal principle in the Anglo-American common law under which a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property—usually land (real property)—may acquire legal ownership based on continuous possession or occupation of the property without the permission (licence) of its legal owner. The possession by a person is not adverse if they are in possession as a tenant or licensee of the legal owner.
Adverse party An adverse party is an opposing party in a lawsuit under an adversary system of law. In general, an adverse party is a party against whom judgment is sought or "a party interested in sustaining a judgment or decree." For example, the adverse party for a defendant is the plaintiff.
Adverse (film) Adverse is a 2020 American crime thriller film written and directed by Brian Metcalf and starring Thomas Nicholas, Lou Diamond Phillips, Sean Astin, Kelly Arjen, Penelope Ann Miller, and Mickey Rourke. It premiered at the Fantasporto Film Festival, Portugal's largest film festival, on February 28, 2020.
Anthony Adverse Anthony Adverse is a 1936 American epic historical drama film directed by Mervyn LeRoy and starring Fredric March and Olivia de Havilland. The screenplay by Sheridan Gibney draws elements of its plot from eight of the nine books in Hervey Allen's historical novel, Anthony Adverse.
Hostile witness A hostile witness, also known as an adverse witness or an unfavorable witness, is a witness at trial whose testimony on direct examination is either openly antagonistic or appears to be contrary to the legal position of the party who called the witness. This concept is used in the legal proceedings in the United States, and analogues of it exist in other legal systems in Western countries.
Diuretic Diuresis () is increased urination (polyuria) or, in the related word senses more often intended, the physiologic process that produces such an increase or the administration of medications to encourage that process. It involves extra urine production in the kidneys as part of the body's homeostatic maintenance of fluid balance.In healthy people, the drinking of extra water produces mild diuresis to maintain the body water balance.
Adverse event An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event (AE) can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.AEs in patients participating in clinical trials must be reported to the study sponsor and if required could be reported to local ethics committee.
Given circumstances The term Given Circumstances is a principle from Russian theatre practitioner Konstantin Stanislavski's methodology for actor training, formulated in the first half of the 20th century at the Moscow Art Theatre. \nThe term given circumstances is applied to the total set of environmental and situational conditions which influence the actions that a character in a drama undertakes.
Kare Kano Kare Kano (Japanese: 彼氏彼女の事情, Hepburn: Kareshi Kanojo no Jijō, lit. "His and Her Circumstances") is a Japanese manga series written and illustrated by Masami Tsuda.
Circumstances (song) "Circumstances" is a song by Canadian rock band Rush from its 1978 album Hemispheres. Lyrically, it is an autobiographical account by drummer Neil Peart about the time he spent living in England, and his eventual disillusionment with his then-current occupations.
Aggravation (law) Aggravation, in law, is "any circumstance attending the commission of a crime or tort which increases its guilt or enormity or adds to its injurious consequences, but which is above and beyond the essential constituents of the crime or tort itself."Aggravated assault, for example, is usually differentiated from simple assault by the offender's intent (e.g., to murder or to rape), the extent of injury to the victim, or the use of a deadly weapon. An aggravating circumstance is a kind of attendant circumstance and the opposite of an extenuating or mitigating circumstance, which decreases guilt.
At the Villa of Reduced Circumstances At the Villa of Reduced Circumstances is a book by Scottish author and academic Alexander McCall Smith, relating further matters in the life of the main character, Professor Dr Moritz-Maria von Igelfeld.\n\n\n== Plot ==\nThe Professor is a troubled German academic whose life's achievement is the (fictional) book, Portuguese Irregular Verbs.
California California is a state in the Western United States. California borders Oregon to the north, Nevada and Arizona to the east, the Mexican state of Baja California to the south; and has a coastline along the Pacific Ocean to the west.
Partnership A partnership is an arrangement where parties, known as business partners, agree to cooperate to advance their mutual interests. The partners in a partnership may be individuals, businesses, interest-based organizations, schools, governments or combinations.
Limited partnership A limited partnership (LP) is a form of partnership similar to a general partnership except that while a general partnership must have at least two general partners (GPs), a limited partnership must have at least one GP and at least one limited partner. Limited partnerships are distinct from limited liability partnerships, in which all partners have limited liability.
Domestic partnership A domestic partnership is a legal relationship between two individuals who live together and share a common domestic life, but are not married (to each other or to anyone else). People in domestic partnerships receive benefits that guarantee right of survivorship, hospital visitation, and others.
Limited liability partnership A limited liability partnership (LLP) is a partnership in which some or all partners (depending on the jurisdiction) have limited liabilities. It therefore can exhibit elements of partnerships and corporations.
General partnership A general partnership, the basic form of partnership under common law, is in most countries an association of persons or an unincorporated company with the following major features:\n\nMust be created by agreement, proof of existence and estoppel.\nFormed by two or more persons\nThe owners are jointly and severally liable for any legal actions and debts the company may face, unless otherwise provided by law or in the agreement.It is a partnership in which partners share equally in both responsibility and liability.
Partnership (cricket) In the sport of cricket, two batsmen always bat in partnership, although only one is a striker at any time. The partnership between two batsmen will come to an end when one of them is dismissed or retires, or the innings comes to a close (usually due to victory being achieved, a declaration, a time or over limit being reached, or the match being abandoned in mid-innings for inclement weather or, exceptionally, dangerous may \nbe between more than two batsmen, if one of the original batsmen is retired not out (rather than retired out), since the particular numbered wicket will not have fallen yet.
Articles of partnership Articles of partnership is a voluntary contract between/among two or more persons to place their capital, labor, and skills into business, with the understanding that there will be a sharing of the profits and losses between/among partners. Outside of North America, it is normally referred to simply as a partnership agreement.A partnership agreement is the written and legal agreement between/among business partners.
Detroit Partnership The Detroit Partnership (also known as the Detroit crime family, Detroit Combination, Detroit Mafia, Zerilli crime family, and the Tocco–Zerilli crime family) (Italian pronunciation: [dzeˈrilli]) is an Italian-American organized crime syndicate based in Detroit, Michigan, and mainly operates in the Greater Detroit area as part of the larger Italian-American Mafia. They hold interests in Windsor, Ontario, Toledo, Ohio; as well as other cities in Michigan, Ohio, West Virginia, Nevada, and Sicily.
2022–23 UEFA Champions League The 2022–23 UEFA Champions League will be the 68th season of Europe's premier club football tournament organised by UEFA, and the 31st season since it was renamed from the European Champion Clubs' Cup to the UEFA Champions League.\nThe final will be played at the Atatürk Olympic Stadium in Istanbul, Turkey.
2022–23 UEFA Europa Conference League The 2022–23 UEFA Europa Conference League will be the second season of the UEFA Europa Conference League, Europe's tertiary club football tournament organised by UEFA.\nThe final will be played at Sinobo Stadium in Prague, Czech Republic. The winners of the 2022–23 UEFA Europa Conference League will automatically qualify for the 2023–24 UEFA Europa League group stage, unless they manage to qualify for the 2023–24 UEFA Champions League group stage.As the title holders of the Europa Conference League, Roma qualified for the 2022–23 UEFA Europa League.
Risk Factors
ARDEN REALTY INC ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS In addition to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, readers should carefully consider the following risk factors
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger On December 21, 2005, we, entered into a merger agreement with GECC and Trizec pursuant to which GECC will acquire us through the process set forth under the heading “Proposed Merger” in Item 1 above
In connection with the proposed merger, we have filed a definitive proxy statement with the SEC The proxy statement contains important information about us, the proposed merger and other related matters
We urge all of our stockholders to read the proxy statement
In relation to the proposed merger, we are subject to certain risks including, but not limited to, those set forth below
Failure to complete the merger could negatively impact our stock price and our future business and financial results
Completion of the proposed merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of various conditions, including the receipt of approval from our stockholders, receipt of various approvals and authorizations, and the absence of any order, injunction or decree preventing the completion of the proposed merger
There is no assurance that all of the various conditions will be satisfied or waived
7 _________________________________________________________________ [59]Table of Contents If the proposed merger is not completed for any reason, we will be subject to several risks, including the following: • being required, under certain circumstances, including if we sign a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal from another potential buyer, to pay a termination fee of dlra100dtta0 million; • being required, under certain circumstances, including if we breach the merger agreement, to reimburse GECC for up to dlra10dtta0 million of its costs and expenses in connection with the merger agreement; • having incurred certain costs relating to the proposed merger that are payable whether or not the merger is completed, including legal, accounting, financial advisor and printing fees; and • having had the focus of management directed toward the proposed merger and integration planning instead of on our core business and other opportunities that could have been beneficial to us
In addition, we would not realize any of the expected benefits of having completed the proposed merger
If the proposed merger is not completed, we cannot assure our stockholders that these risks will not materialize or materially adversely affect our business, financial results, financial condition and stock price
Provisions of the merger agreement may deter alternative business combinations and could negatively impact our stock price if the merger agreement is terminated in certain circumstances
Restrictions in the merger agreement on solicitation generally prohibit us from soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a merger or business combination with any other party, including a proposal that might be advantageous to our stockholders when compared to the terms and conditions of the proposed merger
If the merger is not completed, we may not be able to conclude another merger, sale or combination on as favorable terms, in a timely manner, or at all
If the merger agreement is terminated, we, in certain specified circumstances, may be required to pay a termination fee of up to dlra100dtta0 million to GECC In addition, under certain circumstances, we may be required to pay GECC an expense fee of dlra10dtta0 million
These provisions may deter third parties from proposing or pursuing alternative business combinations that might result in greater value to our stockholders than the merger
Our stock price and businesses may be adversely affected if the merger is not completed
If the merger is not completed, the trading price of our common stock may decline, to the extent that the current market prices reflect a market assumption that the merger will be completed
In addition, our businesses and operations may be harmed to the extent that tenants, vendors and others believe that we cannot effectively operate in the marketplace on a stand-alone basis, or there is tenant or employee uncertainty surrounding the future direction of the strategy of our company on a stand-alone basis
Uncertainty regarding the merger may cause tenants, vendors and others to delay or defer decisions concerning their business with our company, which may harm our results of operations going forward if the merger is not completed
Because the merger is subject to several closing conditions, including the approval of the merger by our stockholders, uncertainty exists regarding the completion of the merger
This uncertainty may cause tenants, vendors and others to delay or defer decisions concerning their business with our company, which could negatively affect our business and results of operations
If the planned merger were not completed, we could suffer a number of consequences that may adversely affect our business, results of operations and stock price, including the following: • activities relating to the merger and related uncertainties may lead to a loss of revenue that we may not be able to regain if the merger does not occur; • the market price of our common stock could decline following an announcement that the merger has been abandoned, to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the merger will be completed; • we would remain liable for our costs related to the merger, such as legal fees and a portion of the investment banking fees; • we may not be able to continue our present level of operations and therefore would have to scale back our present level of business and consider additional reductions; and • we may not be able to take advantage of alternative business opportunities or effectively respond to competitive pressures
8 _________________________________________________________________ [60]Table of Contents Real Estate Investment Risks An inability to retain tenants or rent space upon lease expirations may adversely affect our revenues and our ability to service our debt
Through 2010, 2cmam667 leases, including month-to-month leases, comprising approximately 75prca of our leased net rentable square footage and approximately 72prca of our annualized base rents at December 31, 2005 are scheduled to expire as follows: Percentage of Percentage of Number of Aggregate Portfolio Aggregate Portfolio Year Leases Expiring Leased Square Feet Annualized Base Rent Month-to-Month 135 2dtta1 % 1dtta8 % 2006 593 14dtta0 % 13dtta4 % 2007 576 14dtta3 % 13dtta4 % 2008 593 17dtta4 % 17dtta2 % 2009 395 13dtta1 % 12dtta6 % 2010 375 14dtta3 % 13dtta9 % If we are unable to promptly renew or relet leases for all or a substantial portion of this space, or if the rent upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected, our cash flow and business could be adversely affected which would limit our ability to service our debt
Lack of non-farm job growth in Southern California or a deterioration of the local and national economy will adversely affect our operating results
All of our properties are located in Southern California
We believe non-farm job growth to be a leading indicator of office demand for the region
During 2006, a total of approximately 2dtta8 million square feet of occupied space, representing approximately 16dtta0prca of our total net rentable space, including month-to-month leases, will expire
Negative non-farm job growth in our submarkets or a deterioration of the local and/or national economy may result in a decline in occupancy and rental rates and may cause tenant concessions to increase and would most likely negatively affect our operating performance and property values
Competition affects occupancy levels, rents and cost of land which could adversely affect our revenues
Many office properties compete with our properties in attracting tenants to lease space
Some of the competing properties may be newer, better located or owned by parties better capitalized than we are
Although ownership of these competing properties is currently diversified among many different types of owners, from publicly traded companies and institutional investors to small enterprises and individual owners, and no one or group of owners currently dominate or significantly influence the market, consolidation of owners could create efficiencies and marketing advantages for the consolidated group that could adversely affect us
These competitive advantages, the number of competitors and the number of competitive commercial properties in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on the rents we can charge, our ability to lease space in our existing properties or at newly acquired or developed properties and the prices we have to pay for developable land
The financial condition and solvency of our tenants may reduce our cash flow
Tenants may experience a downturn in their business which may cause them to miss rental payments when due or to seek the protection of bankruptcy laws, which could result in rejection and termination of their leases or a delay in recovering possession of their premises
Although we have not experienced material losses from tenant bankruptcies, we cannot assure you that tenants will not file for bankruptcy protection in the future or, if any tenants file, that they will affirm their leases and continue to make rental payments in a timely manner
Because real estate investments are illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when appropriate
Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid
That illiquidity may tend to limit our ability to sell properties promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions
In addition, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, may under specified circumstances impose a 100prca prohibited transaction tax on the profits derived from our sale of properties held for fewer than four years, which could affect our ability to sell our properties
Rising energy costs and power outages in California may have an adverse effect on our operations and revenue
Problems associated with deregulation of the electric industry in California have resulted in significantly higher costs in some areas
All of our properties are currently located in areas served by utilities that either produce their own electricity, or that have procured long-term, fixed rate contracts with commercial electrical providers
While we have no information suggesting that any 9 _________________________________________________________________ [61]Table of Contents future service interruptions are expected, we believe that higher utility costs may continue as price increases are allowed by the California Public Utility Commission or other regulatory agencies
Approximately 22prca of our buildings and 16prca of the total rentable square footage of our portfolio are subject to leases that require our tenants to pay all utility costs
The remainder of our leases provide that tenants will reimburse us for utility costs in excess of a base year amount
Although we have not experienced any material losses resulting from electric deregulation, it is possible that some or all of our tenants will not fulfill their lease obligations and reimburse us for their share of any significant electric rate increases and that we will not be able to retain or replace our tenants if energy problems in California continue
Increases in taxes and regulatory compliance costs may reduce our revenue
Therefore, any tax increases may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay or refinance our debt obligations
Our properties are also subject to various federal, California and local regulatory requirements, such as requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and California and local fire and life safety requirements
Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the imposition of fines by governmental authorities or awards of damages to private litigants
We believe that our properties are currently in substantial compliance with these regulatory requirements
We cannot assure you, however, that these requirements will not be changed or that new requirements will not be imposed that would require significant unanticipated expenditures by us and could have an adverse effect on our cash flow, the amounts available for distributions and on our business
We may acquire properties through partnerships or joint ventures with third parties that could result in financial dependency and management conflicts
We may participate with other entities in property ownership through joint ventures or partnerships in the future
Depending on the characteristics and business objectives of the joint venture or partnership, we may not have voting control over the joint venture or partnership
Partnership or joint venture investments may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not otherwise present, including: • our partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt; • our partners or co-venturers might at any time have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals; and • our partners or co-venturers may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests contrary to our policies or objectives
Neither the partnership agreement of our operating partnership nor our governing documents prevent us from participating in joint ventures with our affiliates
Because a joint venture with an affiliate may not be negotiated in a traditional arm’s length transaction, terms of the joint venture may not be as favorable to us as we could obtain if we entered into a joint venture with an outside third party
We may not be able to successfully integrate or finance our acquisitions
As we acquire additional properties, we will be subject to risks associated with managing new properties, including building systems not operating as expected, delay in or failure to lease vacant space and tenants failing to renew leases as they expire
In addition, our ability to manage our growth effectively will require us to successfully integrate our new acquisitions into our existing accounting systems and property management structure
We cannot assure you that we will be able to succeed with that integration or effectively manage additional properties or that newly acquired properties will perform as expected
Changing market conditions, including competition from other purchasers of suburban office properties, may diminish our opportunities for attractive additional acquisitions
Moreover, acquisition costs of a property may exceed original estimates, possibly making the property uneconomical
Our acquisitions and renovations may not perform as expected
Although we currently have no plans to significantly expand or renovate our properties, we may do so in the future, subject to certain restrictions contained in the merger agreement
Expansion and renovation projects may inconvenience and displace existing tenants, require us to engage in time consuming up-front planning and engineering activities and expend capital, and require us to obtain various government and other approvals, the receipt of which cannot be assured
While our policies with respect to expansion and renovation activities are intended to limit some of the risks otherwise associated with these activities, we will nevertheless incur risks, including expenditures of funds on, and devotion of our time to, projects that may not be completed
10 _________________________________________________________________ [62]Table of Contents Our development activities may be more expensive than anticipated and may not yield our anticipated results
We have preliminary architectural designs completed for an additional 475cmam000 net rentable square feet at the Howard Hughes Center in Los Angeles, California and have completed preliminary designs on a build-to-suit office building at our Long Beach Airport Business Park
We have entitlements for up to 600 hotel rooms at the Howard Hughes Center
We also have a 5-acre developable land parcel in Torrance, California that we are also marketing for a build-to-suit building
Certain restrictions contained in the merger agreement limit our ability to move forward on these developments without the approval of GECC We also intend to review, from time to time, other opportunities for developing and constructing office buildings and other commercial properties in accordance with our development and underwriting policies
We expect to finance our development activities over the next 24 months, subject to certain restrictions contained in the merger agreement, through net cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from asset sales, proceeds from our lines of credit or other secured borrowings
Risks associated with our development activities may include: • abandonment of development opportunities due to a lack of financing or other reasons; • construction costs of a property exceeding original estimates, possibly making the property uneconomical; • occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the property profitable; • construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs; and • development activities would also be subject to risks relating to the inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations
We are not subject to any limit on the amount or percentage of our assets that may be invested in any single property or any single geographic area
Our governing documents do not restrict the amount or percentage of our assets that we may invest in a single property or geographic area
All of our properties are currently in Southern California and we have no immediate plans to invest outside of Southern California
Although the overall Southern California economy is diverse and well balanced, the geographic concentration of our portfolio may make us more susceptible to changes affecting the Southern California economy and real estate markets or damages from regional events such as earthquakes
We may not be able to expand into new markets successfully
While our business is currently limited to the Southern California market, it is possible that we will in the future expand our business to new geographic markets
We will not initially possess the same level of familiarity with new markets outside of Southern California, which could adversely affect our ability to manage, lease, develop or acquire properties in new localities
Financing Risks Our amount of debt could limit our operational flexibility or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition
As of December 31, 2005, we had total debt of approximately dlra1dtta6 billion, consisting of approximately dlra419dtta6 million in secured debt and approximately dlra1dtta2 billion of unsecured debt
” Our indebtedness could: • require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay our debt, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund distributions, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisition and development activity and other business purposes; • make it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt obligations; • limit our ability to refinance our debt and obtain additional debt financing; and • increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and real estate industry conditions and limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the real estate industry
11 _________________________________________________________________ [63]Table of Contents Despite current indebtedness levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt in the future, which would increase the risks associated with our substantial leverage
Neither the partnership agreement of our operating partnership nor our governing documents limit the amount or the percentage of indebtedness that we may incur
We may borrow up to a maximum of dlra330 million under our two lines of credit
As of December 31, 2005, we had the ability to borrow an additional dlra70dtta5 million under these two lines of credit
If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify and could increase the risk of default on our indebtedness
Scheduled debt payments could adversely affect our financial condition
Our cash flow could be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest when due
In addition, we may not be able to refinance existing indebtedness, which in virtually all cases requires substantial principal payments at maturity, and, if we can refinance, the terms of the refinancing might not be as favorable as the terms of our existing indebtedness
If principal payments cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, such as new equity capital, our cash flow will not be sufficient in all years to repay all maturing debt and continue to service and repay our debt obligations
Rises in interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition
An increase in prevailing interest rates would have an immediate effect on the interest rates charged on our variable rate debt which rise and fall upon changes in interest rates
At December 31, 2005, approximately 14prca of our debt was variable rate debt
Increases in interest rates would also impact the refinancing of our fixed rate debt
If interest rates are higher when our fixed debt becomes due, we may be forced to borrow at the higher rates
If prevailing interest rates or other factors result in higher interest rates, the increased interest expense would adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service our debt
As a protection against rising interest rates, we may enter into agreements such as interest rate hedges, caps, floors and other interest rate exchange contracts
These agreements, however, increase our risks as to the other parties to the agreements not performing or that the agreements could be unenforceable
Many of our properties are subject to mortgage financing which could result in foreclosure if we are unable to pay or refinance the mortgages when due
We currently have four outstanding mortgage financings totaling approximately dlra358dtta2 million that are secured by 46 of our properties
The properties in each of these financings are fully cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted
The cross-defaults can give the lender a number of remedies depending on the circumstances such as the right to increase the interest rate, demand additional collateral, accelerate the maturity date of the mortgages or foreclose on and sell the properties
Three additional properties are subject to single property mortgages totaling approximately dlra61dtta5 million at December 31, 2005
If we are unable to meet our obligations under these mortgages, we could be forced to pay higher interest rates or provide additional collateral or the properties subject to the mortgages could be foreclosed upon and sold, which could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to pay or refinance our debt obligations
Tax Risks Our desire to qualify as a REIT restricts our ability to accumulate cash that might be used in future periods to make debt payments or to fund future growth
In order to qualify as a REIT and avoid federal income tax liability, we must distribute to our stockholders at least 90prca of our net taxable income, excluding net capital gain, and to avoid income taxation, our distributions must not be less than 100prca of our net taxable income, including capital gains
To avoid excise tax liability, our distributions to our stockholders for the year must exceed the sum of 85prca of its ordinary income, 95prca of its capital gain net income, and any undistributed taxable income from prior years
As a result of these distribution requirements, we do not expect to accumulate significant amounts of cash
Accordingly, these distributions could significantly reduce the cash available to us in subsequent periods to make payments on our debt obligations and to fund future growth
Our operating partnership intends to qualify as a partnership, but we cannot guarantee that it will qualify
Our operating partnership intends to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes
However, if our operating partnership were a “publicly traded partnership,” it would be treated as a corporation instead of a partnership for federal income tax purposes unless at least 90prca of its income is qualifying income as defined in the Internal Revenue Code
The income requirements applicable to REITs and the definition of “qualifying income” for purposes of this 90prca test are similar in most respects
Qualifying income for the 90prca test generally includes passive income, such as specified types of real property rents, dividends and interest
We believe that our operating partnership would meet this 90prca test, but we cannot guarantee that it would
If our operating partnership 12 _________________________________________________________________ [64]Table of Contents were to be taxed as a corporation, it would incur substantial tax liabilities and we would fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes
We may suffer adverse tax consequences and be unable to attract capital if we fail to qualify as a REIT We believe that since our taxable year ended December 31, 1996, we have been organized and operated, and intend to continue to operate, so as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code
Although we believe that we have been and will continue to be organized and have operated and will continue to operate so as to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we cannot assure you that we have been or will continue to be organized or operated in a manner so as to qualify or remain so qualified
For us to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy numerous requirements established under highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations and tests regarding various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control
The complexity of these provisions and of the applicable Treasury Regulations that have been promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code is greater in the case of a REIT, like us, that holds its assets through an investment in a partnership
No assurance can be given that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly change the tax laws with respect to our qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of qualification
We are, however, not aware of any pending legislation that would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on our ability to meet, through actual annual operating results, asset diversification, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership, the various qualification tests imposed under the Internal Revenue Code, the results of which have not been and will not be reviewed by our tax counsel
If we failed to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates
Moreover, unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we also would be disqualified as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost
If we were disqualified as a REIT, our ability to raise additional capital could be significantly impaired
This could reduce the funds we would have available to pay distributions to our stockholders and to service our debt
Even if we qualify for and maintain our REIT status, we will be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property
For example, if we have net income from a prohibited transaction, specifically sales or other taxable dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, that income will be subject to a 100prca tax
Other Risks We are subject to agreements and policies that may deter change in control offers that might be attractive to our stockholders
Certain provisions of our charter and bylaws may delay, defer or prevent a third party from making offers to acquire us or assume control over us
For example, such provisions may: • deter tender offers for our common stock, which offers may be attractive to the stockholders; and • deter purchases of large blocks of common stock, thereby limiting the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their common stock over then-prevailing market prices
Our charter contains a provision designed to prevent a concentration of ownership among our stockholders that would cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT Under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50prca in value of our outstanding shares of common stock may be owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals, including specific kinds of entities, at any time during the last half of our taxable year
In addition, if we, or an owner of 10prca or more of our common stock, actually or constructively owns 10prca or more of a tenant of ours, or a tenant of any partnership in which we are a partner, the rent received by us from that tenant will not be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests
In order to protect us against the risk of losing REIT status, the ownership limit included in our charter limits actual or constructive ownership of our outstanding shares of common stock by any single stockholder to 9dtta0prca, by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the then outstanding shares of common stock
Actual or constructive ownership of shares of common stock in excess of the ownership limit will cause the violative transfer or ownership to be void with respect to the transferee or owner as to that number of shares in excess of the ownership limit and such shares will be automatically transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more qualified charitable organizations
That transferee or owner will have no right to vote such shares or be entitled to dividends or other distributions with respect to such shares
Although our Board of Directors presently has no intention of doing so, except as described below, our Board of Directors could waive this restriction with respect to a particular stockholder if it were satisfied, based upon the advice of counsel or a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, that ownership by such stockholder in excess of the ownership limit would not jeopardize our status as a REIT and our Board of Directors otherwise decided such action would be in our best interests
Our Board of Directors has waived our ownership limit with respect to Mr
Ziman, our Chairman and CEO, and certain family members and affiliates and has permitted these parties to actually and constructively own up to 13dtta0prca of the outstanding shares of common stock
13 _________________________________________________________________ [65]Table of Contents Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to cause us to issue authorized but unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock and to reclassify any unissued shares of common stock or classify any unissued and reclassify any previously classified but unissued shares of preferred stock and, with respect to the preferred stock, to set the preferences, rights and other terms of such classified or unclassified shares
Although our Board of Directors has no such intention at the present time, it could establish a series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of such series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for the common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors
Directors of each class are chosen for three-year terms upon the expiration of their current terms and each year one class of directors will be elected by the stockholders
The staggered terms of directors may reduce the possibility of a tender offer or an attempt to change control even though a tender offer or change in control might be in the best interest of our stockholders
Losses in excess of our insurance coverage or uninsured losses could adversely affect our cash flow
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, terrorism and rental loss insurance policies which currently cover all of our properties with specifications and insured limits that we believe are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances
Some losses, however, are generally not insured against because it is not economically feasible to do so
Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose our capital invested in the property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property and, in the case of debt which is recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property
Any loss would adversely affect our cash flow with respect to the property subject to the loss
Moreover, we would generally be liable for any unsatisfied obligations other than non-recourse obligations with respect to the property subject to the loss
Lack of availability of insurance coverage for biological, chemical or nuclear terrorist attacks could adversely affect our financial condition
Our current terrorism insurance policy, which has been extended to March 2007, specifically excludes biological, chemical or nuclear terrorist acts
We have been notified by our insurance broker that in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, insurance carriers will continue to exclude these types of attacks from terrorism insurance policies or offer coverage for biological, chemical or nuclear attacks coverages at prohibitive costs
Although we did not derive more than 3dtta5prca of our 2005 net operating income from any one of the properties in our portfolio, a biological, chemical or nuclear terrorist attack damaging several of our properties or negatively impacting the financial condition of our tenants could materially deteriorate our operating results and overall financial condition
An earthquake could adversely affect our business
All of our properties are located in Southern California, which is a high risk geographical area for earthquakes
Depending upon its magnitude, an earthquake could severely damage our properties which would adversely affect our business
We maintain earthquake insurance for our properties and the resulting business interruption
We cannot assure you that our insurance will be sufficient if there is a major earthquake
Our properties may be subject to environmental liabilities
Under federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs in connection with the contamination
These laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants, and the liability under these laws has been interpreted to be joint and several unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility
These costs may be substantial, and the presence of these substances, or the failure to remediate the contamination on the property, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent the property or to borrow against the property
Finally, third parties may have claims against the owner of the site based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site
Specific federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos-containing materials when those materials are in poor condition or in the event of construction, remodeling, renovation or demolition of a building
These laws may impose liability for release of asbestos-containing material and may provide for third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials
In connection with the ownership and operation of our properties, we may be potentially liable for those costs
In the past few years, independent environmental consultants have conducted or updated Phase I environmental assessments and other environmental investigations as appropriate at some of our properties
The environmental site assessments and investigations have identified 38 properties in our portfolio, representing approximately 43prca of the total rentable square feet in the portfolio, affected by environmental concerns
These environmental concerns include properties that may be impacted by known or 14 _________________________________________________________________ [66]Table of Contents suspected (a) contamination caused by third party sources or (b) soil and/or groundwater contamination which has been remediated, and (c) those containing underground storage tanks or asbestos
Of these properties, four are believed to be affected by contamination caused by third party sources and two of these also house an underground storage tank, two contain friable asbestos, twenty contain non-friable asbestos, and twelve house underground storage tanks only
The properties affected by contamination are primarily affected by petroleum and solvent substances, and in each case a third party has indemnified us for any and all problems associated with this contamination
With regard to those properties affected by asbestos, asbestos does not pose a health hazard if it is not disturbed in such a way to cause an airborne release of asbestos
Asbestos is friable when it can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure, and non-friable when hand pressure cannot release encapsulated asbestos fibers
Friable asbestos is more likely to be released into the air than non-friable asbestos
We manage all asbestos in ways that minimize its potential to become airborne or otherwise threaten human health
Regarding underground storage tanks, subsurface leakage of the materials contained within the tank constitutes the primary risk posed by these devices
Of the fourteen underground storage tanks, two are currently being removed and no known UST-related regulatory violations or outstanding compliance issues exist with the remainder
We have also implemented a program to ensure appropriate double-wall construction, testing protocols, placement of tanks within bermed areas, and the installation of leak and spill detection equipment at relevant sites
Environmental site assessments and investigations completed to date have not, however, revealed any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets or results of operations taken as a whole, nor are we aware of any material environmental liability
Nevertheless, it is possible that our environmental site assessments do not reveal all environmental liabilities or that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are unaware
We believe that our properties are in compliance in all material respects with all federal, state and local laws regarding hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products, except as noted above
We have not been notified by any governmental authority, and are not otherwise aware, of any material noncompliance, liability or claim relating to hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products in connection with any of our present properties, other than as noted above
It is possible that future laws will impose material environmental liabilities on us and that the current environmental condition of our properties will be affected by tenants, by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or by third parties unrelated to us
We may incur increased costs as a result of enacted and proposed changes in laws and regulations
Enacted and proposed changes in the law and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules proposed by the SEC and by the New York Stock Exchange has resulted in significant increased compliance costs to us as we evaluate the implications of any new rules and comply to their requirements
The new rules could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage
The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers
The compliance with and the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in future years will result in significant continuing costs to us