Home
Jump to Risk Factors
Jump to Industries
Jump to Exposures
Jump to Event Codes
Jump to Wiki Summary

Industries
Asset Management and Custody Banks
Independent Power Producers and Energy Traders
Managed Health Care
Application Software
Exposures
Regime
Express intent
Intelligence
Crime
Provide
Cooperate
Judicial
Military
Ease
Political reform
Rights
Event Codes
Sanction
Accident
Release or return
Demand
Yield
Grant
Yield to order
Comment
Consult
Force
Vote
Solicit support
Warn
Agree
Human death
Request
Adjust
Empathize
Endorse
Reward
Complain
Sports contest
Propose
Host meeting
Promise policy support
Natural disaster
Wiki Wiki Summary
Government A government is the system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state.\nIn the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary.
Government of India The Government of India (ISO: Bhārat Sarkār) (often abbreviated as GoI; also known as the Central or Union Government), or simply the Centre, is the federal governing authority of the Republic of India created by the Constitution of India as the legislative, executive and judicial authority to govern the union of twenty eight states and eight union territories. The president acts as the head of state and is the highest figure of authority, nominally, of the nation however it is the prime minister who is the chief executive.
Federal government of the United States The federal government of the United States (U.S. federal government or U.S. government) is the national government of the United States, a federal republic in North America, composed of 50 states, a city within a federal district (the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, where the entire federal government is based), five major self-governing territories and several island possessions. The federal government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the president and the federal courts, respectively.
Local government Local government is a generic term for the lowest tiers of public administration within a particular sovereign state. This particular usage of the word government refers specifically to a level of administration that is both geographically-localised and has limited powers.
Regulation Regulation is the management of complex systems according to a set of rules and trends. In systems theory, these types of rules exist in various fields of biology and society, but the term has slightly different meanings according to context.
Vehicle emission standard Emission standards are the legal requirements governing air pollutants released into the atmosphere. Emission standards set quantitative limits on the permissible amount of specific air pollutants that may be released from specific sources over specific timeframes.
Regulation A In the United States under the Securities Act of 1933, any offer to sell securities must either be registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or meet certain qualifications to exempt it from such registration. Regulation A (or Reg A) contains rules providing exemptions from the registration requirements, allowing some companies to use equity crowdfunding to offer and sell their securities without having to register the securities with the SEC. Regulation A offerings are intended to make access to capital possible for small and medium-sized companies that could not otherwise bear the costs of a normal SEC registration and to allow nonaccredited investors to participate in the offering.
Regulation (European Union) A regulation is a legal act of the European Union that becomes immediately enforceable as law in all member states simultaneously. Regulations can be distinguished from directives which, at least in principle, need to be transposed into national law.
Regulation of therapeutic goods The regulation of therapeutic goods, defined as drugs and therapeutic devices, varies by jurisdiction. In some countries, such as the United States, they are regulated at the national level by a single agency.
Subsidiary title A subsidiary title is an hereditary title held by a royal or noble person but which is not regularly used to identify that person, due to the concurrent holding of a greater title.\n\n\n== United Kingdom ==\nAn example in the United Kingdom is the Duke of Norfolk, who is also the Earl of Arundel, the Earl of Surrey, the Earl of Norfolk, the Baron Beaumont, the Baron Maltravers, the Baron FitzAlan, the Baron Clun, the Baron Oswaldestre, and the Baron Howard of Glossop.
Operating subsidiary An operating subsidiary is a subsidiary of a corporation through which the parent company (which may or may not be a holding company) indirectly conducts some portion of its business. Usually, an operating subsidiary can be distinguished in that even if its board of directors and officers overlap with those of other entities in the same corporate group, it has at least some officers and employees who conduct business operations primarily on behalf of the subsidiary alone (that is, they work directly for the subsidiary).
Subsidiary alliance A subsidiary alliance, in South Asian history, was a tributary alliance between an Indian state and a European East India Company. The system of subsidiary alliances was pioneered by the French East India Company governor Joseph François Dupleix, who in the late 1740s established treaties with the Nizam of Hyderabad, India, and other Indian princes in the Carnatic.It stated that the Indian rulers who formed a treaty with the British would be provided with protection against any external attacks in place that the rulers were (a) required to keep the British army at the capitals of their states (b)they were either to give either money or some territory to the company for the maintenance of the British troops (c) they were to turn out from their states all non-english europeans whether they were employed in the army or in the civil service and (d)they had to keep a British official called 'resident' at the capital of their respective states who would oversee all the negotiations and talks with the other states which meant that the rulers were to have no direct correspondence or relations with the other states .
Subsidiary right A subsidiary right (also called a subright or sub-lease) is the right to produce or publish a product in different formats based on the original material. Subsidiary rights are common in the publishing and entertainment industries, in which subsidiary rights are granted by the author to an agent, publisher, newspaper, or film studio.
Alphabet Inc. Alphabet Inc. is an American multinational technology conglomerate holding company headquartered in Mountain View, California.
List of Gazprom subsidiaries Russian energy company Gazprom has several hundred subsidiaries and affiliated companies owned and controlled directly or indirectly. The subsidiaries and affiliated companies are listed by country.
Paper railroad In the United States, a paper railroad is a company in the railroad business that exists "on paper only": as a legal entity which does not own any track, locomotives, or rolling stock.\nIn the early days of railroad construction, paper railroads had to exist by necessity while in the financing stage.
List of Toshiba subsidiaries Subsidiaries of Toshiba. Together, these companies form the Toshiba Group.
Profit (economics) An economic profit is the difference between the revenue a commercial entity has received from its outputs and the opportunity costs of its inputs. It equals to total revenue minus total cost, including both explicit and implicit costs.
Profitability analysis In cost accounting, profitability analysis is an analysis of the profitability of an organisation's output. Output of an organisation can be grouped into products, customers, locations, channels and/or transactions.
Profitability index Profitability index (PI), also known as profit investment ratio (PIR) and value investment ratio (VIR), is the ratio of payoff to investment of a proposed project. It is a useful tool for ranking projects because it allows you to quantify the amount of value created per unit of investment.
Customer Profitability Analysis Customer Profitability Analysis (in short CPA) is a management accounting and a credit underwriting method, allowing businesses and lenders to determine the profitability of each customer or segments of customers, by attributing profits and costs to each customer separately. CPA can be applied at the individual customer level (more time consuming, but providing a better understanding of business situation) or at the level of customer aggregates / groups (e.g.
Customer profitability Customer Profitability Analysis (in short CPA) is a management accounting and a credit underwriting method, allowing businesses and lenders to determine the profitability of each customer or segments of customers, by attributing profits and costs to each customer separately. CPA can be applied at the individual customer level (more time consuming, but providing a better understanding of business situation) or at the level of customer aggregates / groups (e.g.
Profitable growth Profitable Growth is the combination of profitability and growth, more precisely the combination of Economic Profitability and Growth of Free cash flows. Profitable growth is aimed at seducing the financial community; it emerged in the early 80s when shareholder value creation became firms’ main objective.
SAP ERP SAP ERP is an enterprise resource planning software developed by the German company SAP SE. SAP ERP incorporates the key business functions of an organization. The latest version of SAP ERP (V.6.0) was made available in 2006.
Porter's five forces analysis Porter's Five Forces Framework is a method of analysing the operating environment of a competition of a business. It draws from industrial organization (IO) economics to derive five forces that determine the competitive intensity and, therefore, the attractiveness (or lack thereof) of an industry in terms of its profitability.
Round dance (honey bee) A round dance is the communicative behaviour of a foraging honey bee (Apis mellifera), in which she moves on the comb in close circles, alternating right and then left. It is previously believed that the round dance indicates that the forager has located a profitable food source close to the hive and the round dance transitions into the waggle dance when food sources are more than 50 meters away.
Special Activities Center The Special Activities Center (SAC) is a division of the Central Intelligence Agency responsible for covert operations and paramilitary operations. The unit was named Special Activities Division (SAD) prior to 2015.
Operation Mincemeat Operation Mincemeat was a successful British deception operation of the Second World War to disguise the 1943 Allied invasion of Sicily. Two members of British intelligence obtained the body of Glyndwr Michael, a tramp who died from eating rat poison, dressed him as an officer of the Royal Marines and placed personal items on him identifying him as the fictitious Captain (Acting Major) William Martin.
Arithmetic Arithmetic (from Ancient Greek ἀριθμός (arithmós) 'number', and τική [τέχνη] (tikḗ [tékhnē]) 'art, craft') is an elementary part of mathematics that consists of the study of the properties of the traditional operations on numbers—addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation, and extraction of roots. In the 19th century, Italian mathematician Giuseppe Peano formalized arithmetic with his Peano axioms, which are highly important to the field of mathematical logic today.
Operations management Operations management is an area of management concerned with designing and controlling the process of production and redesigning business operations in the production of goods or services. It involves the responsibility of ensuring that business operations are efficient in terms of using as few resources as needed and effective in meeting customer requirements.
Emergency operations center An emergency operations center (EOC) is a central command and control facility responsible for carrying out the principles of emergency preparedness and emergency management, or disaster management functions at a strategic level during an emergency, and ensuring the continuity of operation of a company, political subdivision or other organization.\nAn EOC is responsible for strategic direction and operational decisions and does not normally directly control field assets, instead leaving tactical decisions to lower commands.
Operations research Operations research (British English: operational research), often shortened to the initialism OR, is a discipline that deals with the development and application of advanced analytical methods to improve decision-making. It is sometimes considered to be a subfield of mathematical sciences.
Operation (mathematics) In mathematics, an operation is a function which takes zero or more input values (called operands) to a well-defined output value. The number of operands (also known as arguments) is the arity of the operation.
Mergers and acquisitions In corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are transactions in which the ownership of companies, other business organizations, or their operating units are transferred or consolidated with other entities. As an aspect of strategic management, M&A can allow enterprises to grow or downsize, and change the nature of their business or competitive position.
Knowledge acquisition Knowledge acquisition is the process used to define the rules and ontologies required for a knowledge-based system. The phrase was first used in conjunction with expert systems to describe the initial tasks associated with developing an expert system, namely finding and interviewing domain experts and capturing their knowledge via rules, objects, and frame-based ontologies.
Risk Factors
AMERIGROUP CORP Item 1A Risk Factors RISK FACTORS Risks related to being a regulated entity Changes in government regulations designed to protect providers and members rather than our stockholders could force us to change how we operate and could harm our business
Our business is extensively regulated by the states in which we operate and by the federal government
These laws and regulations are generally intended to benefit and protect providers and health plan members rather than stockholders
Changes in existing laws and rules, the enactment of new laws and rules and changing interpretations of these laws and rules could, among other things: • force us to change how we do business, • restrict revenue and enrollment growth, • increase our health benefits and administrative costs, • impose additional capital requirements, and • increase or change our claims liability
If state regulators do not approve payments of dividends, distributions or administrative fees by our subsidiaries to us, it could negatively affect our business strategy
We principally operate through our health plan subsidiaries
These subsidiaries are subject to regulations that limit the amount of dividends and distributions that can be paid to us without prior approval of, or notification to, state regulators
We also have administrative services agreements with our subsidiaries in which we agree to provide them with services and benefits (both tangible and intangible) in exchange for the payment of a fee
If the regulators were to deny our subsidiaries’ requests to pay dividends to us or restrict or disallow the payment of the administrative fee or not allow us to recover the costs of providing the services under our administrative services agreement, the funds available to our Company as a whole would be limited, which could harm our ability to implement our business strategy, expand our infrastructure, improve our information technology systems and make needed capital expenditures
Regulations could limit our profits as a percentage of revenues
Our New Jersey, Maryland and Illinois subsidiaries are subject to minimum medical expense levels as a percentage of premium revenue
Our Florida subsidiary is subject to minimum behavioral health expense levels as a percentage of behavioral health premium
In Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland and Florida, contractual sanctions may be imposed if these levels are not met
In addition, our Ohio subsidiary is subject to certain administrative limits
These regulatory requirements, changes in these requirements and additional requirements by our other regulators could limit our ability to increase or maintain our overall profits as a percentage of revenues, which could harm our operating results
We have been required, and may in the future be required, to make payments to the states as a result of not meeting these expense levels
Our Texas health plan is required to pay a rebate to the State of Texas in the event profits exceed established levels
The rebate calculation reports that we filed for the contract years ended August 31, 2000 through 2004 are currently being audited by a contracted auditing firm
In a preliminary report, the auditor has challenged inclusion in the rebate calculation certain expenses incurred by the Company in providing services to the health plan under the administrative services agreement
Although we believe that the rebate calculations were done appropriately, if the regulators were ultimately to disallow certain of these expenses in the rebate calculation, it could result in the requirement that we pay the State of Texas additional amounts for these prior periods and it could reduce our profitability in future periods
23 _________________________________________________________________ Our failure to comply with government regulations could subject us to civil and criminal penalties and limitations on our profitability
Violation of the laws or regulations governing our operations could result in the imposition of sanctions, the cancellation of our contracts to provide services, or in the extreme case, the suspension or revocation of our licenses
For example, in four markets in which we operate we are required to spend a minimum percentage of our premium revenue on medical expenses
If we fail to comply with this requirement, we could be required to pay monetary damages
Additionally, we could be required to file a corrective plan of action with the state and we could be subject to further fines and additional corrective measures if we did not comply with the corrective plan of action
Our failure to comply could also affect future rate determinations and membership enrollment levels
These regulations could limit the profits we can obtain
Additionally, we can give no assurance that the terms of our contracts with the states or the manner in which we are directed to comply with our state contracts is in accordance with CMS regulations
While we have not been subject to any fines or violations that were material, we cannot assure you that we will not become subject to material fines or other sanctions in the future
If we became subject to material fines or if other sanctions or other corrective actions were imposed upon us, our ability to continue to operate our business could be materially and adversely affected
From time-to-time we have been subject to sanctions as a result of violations of marketing regulations in Illinois, Florida and New York and for failure to meet timeliness of the payment requirements in New Jersey
In 2005, the Florida and New York plans were fined for marketing violations
We are aware that New York State authorities are reviewing compliance with marketing and enrollment rules by Medicaid managed care organizations
The Company’s New York managed care subsidiary is also reviewing its marketing and enrollment practices with respect to compliance with these regulations
Although we train our employees with respect to compliance with state and federal laws and the marketing rules of each of the states in which we do business, no assurance can be given that violations will not occur
On October 12, 2001, we responded to a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) of the HMO industry by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas relating to processing of provider claims
We understand from the Office of the Attorney General that responses were required from the nine largest HMOs in Texas, of which, at the time, we were the ninth
The other eight are HMOs that primarily provide commercial products
The CID is being conducted in connection with allegations of unfair contracting, delegating and payment practices and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act and Article 21dtta21 of the Texas Insurance Code by HMOs
It is our understanding that we are not currently the target of any investigation by the Office of the Attorney General
The Office of the Attorney General could request additional information or clarification that could be costly and time consuming for us to produce
HIPAA broadened the scope of fraud and abuse laws applicable to healthcare companies
HIPAA created civil penalties for, among other things, billing for medically unnecessary goods or services
HIPAA establishes new enforcement mechanisms to combat fraud and abuse, including a whistle-blower program
Further, HIPAA imposes civil and criminal penalties for failure to comply with the privacy and security standards set forth in the regulation
Despite a press release issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, (HHS) recommending that Congress create a private right of action under HIPAA, no such private cause of action has yet been created, and we do not know when or if such changes may be enacted
The federal government has enacted, and state governments are enacting, other fraud and abuse laws as well
Our failure to comply with HIPAA or these other laws could result in criminal or civil penalties and exclusion from Medicaid or other governmental healthcare programs and could lead to the revocation of our licenses
These penalties or exclusions, were they to occur, would negatively impact our ability to operate our business
Compliance with new federal and state rules and regulations may require us to make unanticipated expenditures
The federal government and the governments of the states in which we operate have in the past and may in the future pass laws on implementing regulations which have had or may have the effect of changing the way we do business or raising the cost of doing business
Regulations implementing HIPAA have had such an effect
In 24 _________________________________________________________________ 2003, regulations were promulgated under HIPAA requiring the use of electronic transactions and code sets for healthcare claims and payment transactions submitted or received electronically and to protect the security and privacy of health-related information
Regulations have now been promulgated requiring the implementation of the NPI by May of 2007
Costs will be incurred in the future to implement NPI, although no estimate can be made at this time as to the cost of compliance and implementation
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the NYSE, have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices
Our management and other personnel will need to continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these new compliance initiatives
Moreover, these rules and regulations have and will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 also requires that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
In particular, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, our internal control over our financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Our testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses
Our compliance with Section 404 will continue to require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management time and effort
Moreover, if we are not able to continue to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the NYSE, SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources
In certain of the markets in which we do business, state laws or insurance regulations require that our HMO, MCO, and PHSP subsidiaries participate in guarantee funds to protect consumers and providers in the event of the insolvency of an HMO or other insurer
Our HMO, MCO, and PHSP subsidiaries have in the past, and may in the future, be subject to unanticipated assessments from such funds which may be material in amount
Changes in healthcare laws could reduce our profitability
Numerous proposals relating to changes in healthcare law have been introduced, some of which have been passed by Congress and the states in which we operate or may operate in the future
These include Medicaid reform initiatives in Florida and Illinois’ Primary Care Case Management program, as well as waivers requested by states for various elements of their programs
Changes in applicable laws and regulations are continually being considered and interpretations of existing laws and rules may also change from time-to-time
We are unable to predict what regulatory changes may occur or what effect any particular change may have on our business
Although some of the recent changes in government regulations, such as the removal of the requirements on the enrollment mix between commercial and public sector membership, have encouraged managed care participation in public sector programs, we are unable to predict whether new laws or proposals will continue to favor or hinder the growth of managed healthcare
We cannot predict the outcome of these legislative or regulatory proposals, nor the effect which they might have on us
Legislation or regulations that require us to change our current manner of operation, provide additional benefits or change our contract arrangements could seriously harm our operations and financial results
Changes in federal funding mechanisms could reduce our profitability
On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed the Budget Reconciliation Bill (the Bill) passed by Congress to reduce the size of the federal deficit
Net savings for Medicaid totals dlra4dtta75 billion over five years, and the legislation includes a number of reforms to the Medicaid program
These reform measures include providing states with greater flexibility in establishing cost-sharing and premium payments for Medicaid beneficiaries, and provide states with increased flexibility in establishing benchmark benefit packages for Medicaid beneficiaries
In addition, the Bill tightens rules on how assets are treated for purposes of qualifying for Medicaid coverage
The Bill also makes changes to how prescription drugs are priced within the Medicaid program
25 _________________________________________________________________ The Bill includes some provisions that directly affect Medicaid managed care companies
It prohibits the further use of Medicaid MCO provider taxes for purposes of receiving federal financial participation
In order for a provider tax to be eligible for a federal match, it must be broad based and not limited to Medicaid MCO plans only
The legislation, however, provides an exemption for states that currently have MCO provider taxes in effect and allows these programs to remain in existence through September of 2009
The Bill also establishes a payment ceiling for emergency room services provided by a hospital provider not under contract with a Medicaid MCO It limits payments to no more than Medicaid Fee-For-Service amounts for out-of-network emergency services
States are just beginning to examine the many changes that this legislation will bring to the Medicaid program
It is uncertain if states will make significant changes to their Medicaid programs in the near future, but such changes, depending on their scope, could impact our revenue or membership
In addition, Congress and the federal government may adopt changes in Medicare reimbursement levels that might negatively affect our SNP business
Reductions in Medicaid funding by the states could substantially reduce our profitability
Most of our revenues come from state government Medicaid premiums
The base premium rate paid by each state differs, depending on a combination of various factors such as defined upper payment limits, a member’s health status, age, gender, county or region, benefit mix and member eligibility category
Future levels of Medicaid premium rates may be affected by continued government efforts to contain medical costs and may further be affected by state and federal budgetary constraints
Changes to Medicaid programs could reduce the number of persons enrolled or eligible, reduce the amount of reimbursement or payment levels, or increase our administrative or healthcare costs under such programs
States periodically consider reducing or reallocating the amount of money they spend for Medicaid
We believe that additional reductions in Medicaid payments could substantially reduce our profitability
Further, our contracts with the states are subject to cancellation by the state in the event of unavailability of state funds
In some jurisdictions, such cancellation may be immediate and in other jurisdictions a notice period is required
State governments generally are experiencing tight budgetary conditions within their Medicaid programs
Budget problems in the states in which we operate could result in limited increases or even decreases in the premiums paid to us by the states
If any state in which we operate were to decrease premiums paid to us, or pay us less than the amount necessary to keep pace with our cost trends, it could have a material adverse effect on our profitability
If state governments do not renew our contracts with them on favorable terms, our business will suffer
As of December 31, 2005, we served members who received healthcare benefits through 20 contracts with the regulatory entities in the jurisdictions in which we operate
Five of these contracts, which are with the States of Florida, Maryland, New Jersey and Texas, individually accounted for 10prca or more of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005, with the largest of these contracts representing approximately 18prca of our revenues
If any of our contracts were not renewed on favorable terms or were terminated for cause or if we were to lose a contract in a re-bidding process, our business would suffer
All our contracts have been extended until at least mid-2006
Termination or non-renewal of any single contract could materially impact our revenues and operating results
Some of our contracts are subject to a re-bidding or re-application process
For example, our Texas markets are re-bid every six years and the re-bidding process occurred in 2005
We currently are in the process of implementing the changes resulting from this re-bid
If we lost a contract through the re-bidding process, or if an increased number of competitors were awarded contracts in a specific market, our operating results could be materially and adversely affected
Though the State could re-bid the program in 2006, our SCHIP contract covering our Florida markets will likely re-bid in 2007
We can give no assurance that the contract will extended and not be re-bid
If we lost the contract through the re-bidding process, or if an increased number of competitors were awarded contracts in a specific market, our operating results could be materially and adversely affected
26 _________________________________________________________________ If a state fails to renew its federal waiver application for mandated Medicaid enrollment into managed care or such application is denied, our membership in that state will likely decrease
States may only mandate Medicaid enrollment into managed care under federal waivers or demonstrations
Waivers and programs under demonstrations are approved for two-year periods and can be renewed on an ongoing basis if the state applies
We have no control over this renewal process
If a state does not renew its mandated program or the federal government denies the state’s application for renewal, our business would suffer as a result of a likely decrease in membership
Delays in program expansions, renewals or contract changes could negatively impact our business
In any program start-up, expansion, or re-bid, the state’s ability to manage the implementation as designed may be affected by factors beyond our control
These include political considerations, network development, contract appeals, membership assignment/allocation for members who do not self-select, and errors in the bidding process, as well as difficulties experienced by other private vendors involved in the implementation, such as enrollment brokers
Our business, particularly plans for expansion or increased membership levels, could be negatively impacted by these delays or changes
For example, in 2006, we anticipate a significant increase in our business related to entering the State of Georgia
If the State delays or changes the contract terms, including the enrollment process, marketing rules, or reimbursement rules, our business could be negatively impacted
We rely on the accuracy of eligibility lists provided by the state government, and in the case of our Special Needs Plan members in Houston, by the federal government
Inaccuracies in those lists would negatively affect our results of operations
Premium payments to us are based upon eligibility lists produced by government enrollment data
From time-to-time, governments require us to reimburse them for premiums paid to us based on an eligibility list that a government later discovers contains individuals who are not in fact eligible for a government sponsored program or are eligible for a different premium category or a different program
Alternatively, a government could fail to pay us for members for whom we are entitled to receive payment
Our results of operations would be adversely affected as a result of such reimbursement to the government if we had made related payments to providers and were unable to recoup such payments from the providers
If state regulatory agencies require a statutory capital level higher than the state regulations we may be required to make additional capital contributions
Our operations are conducted through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, which include HMOs, one MCO and one PHSP HMOs
MCOs, and PHSPs are subject to state regulations that, among other things, require the maintenance of minimum levels of statutory capital, as defined by each state
Additionally, state regulatory agencies may require, at their discretion, individual regulated entities to maintain statutory capital levels higher than the state regulations
If this were to occur to one of our subsidiaries, we may be required to make additional capital contributions to the affected subsidiary
Any additional capital contribution made to one of the affected subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to grow
Risks related to our business Receipt of inadequate or significantly delayed premiums would negatively impact our revenues, profitability and cash flow
These premiums are fixed by contract, and we are obligated during the contract period to facilitate access to healthcare services as established by the state governments
We have less control over costs related to the provision of healthcare than we do over our selling, general and administrative expenses
Historically, our expenses related to health benefits as a percentage of premium revenue have fluctuated
For example, our expenses related to health benefits were 84dtta7prca of our premium revenue in 2005, and 81dtta0prca of our premium revenue in 2004
If health benefits costs increase at a higher rate than premium increases, our earnings would be impacted negatively
In addition, if there is a significant delay in our receipt of premiums to offset previously incurred health benefits costs increases, our earnings could be negatively impacted
27 _________________________________________________________________ Maryland sets the rates that must be paid to hospitals by all payors
In 2005, the State increased rates payable to the hospitals without granting a corresponding increase in premiums to us
This discrepancy, which is contrary to State rules, is still in the process of being resolved
If this remains unresolved or were to occur again, or if other states were to take similar actions, our profitability would be harmed
Premiums are contractually payable to us before or during the month for services that we are obligated to provide to our members
Our cash flow would be negatively impacted if premium payments are not made according to contract terms
This situation is likely to occur in the initial months of the conversion to the Special Needs Plan under the Medicare Modernization Act
Our inability to manage medical costs effectively would reduce our profitability
Our profitability depends, to a significant degree, on our ability to predict and effectively manage medical costs
Changes in healthcare regulations and practices, level of use of healthcare services, hospital costs, pharmaceutical costs, major epidemics, new medical technologies and other external factors, including general economic conditions such as inflation levels or natural disasters, are beyond our control and could reduce our ability to predict and effectively control the costs of healthcare services
Although we attempt to manage medical costs through a variety of techniques, including various payment methods to primary care physicians and other providers, advance approval for hospital services and referral requirements, medical management and quality management programs, and our information systems and reinsurance arrangements, we may not be able to manage costs effectively in the future
In addition, new products, such as SNP, or new markets, such as Georgia, could pose new and unexpected challenges to effectively manage medical costs
It is possible that there could be an increase in the volume or value of appeals for claims previously denied and claims previously paid to non-network providers will be appealed and subsequently reprocessed at higher amounts
This would result in an adjustment to claims expense
If our costs for medical services increase, our profits could be reduced, or we may not remain profitable
We maintain reinsurance to help protect us against severe or catastrophic medical claims, but we can provide no assurance that such reinsurance coverage will be adequate or available to us in the future or that the cost of such reinsurance will not limit our ability to obtain it
We have a significant relationship with Cook Children’s Physician Network in Fort Worth, Texas
Termination of this relationship could negatively affect our results of operations
We had an exclusive risk-sharing arrangement with Cook Children’s Health Care Network (CCHCN) and Cook Children’s Physician Network (CCPN), which includes Cook Children’s Medical Center (CCMC), that was terminated as of August 31, 2005
In its place, we entered into separate non-exclusive fee-for-service provider agreements with CCPN and CCMC On December 27, 2005, CCPN and CCMC each sent notices indicating their intent to terminate these agreements as of March 31, 2006
We do not believe that such terminations are warranted under these agreements
It is our intent to take appropriate actions to persuade CCPN and CCMC to rescind their notices of termination
However, there is no assurance that our efforts will be successful
CCPN and CCMC control most of the inpatient and specialty pediatric services available in Fort Worth, Texas
If these agreements terminate, it would force us to make alternate arrangements for many services to our pediatric membership, which may adversely impact our costs and our membership
Therefore, our results from operations could be harmed as a result of the termination of these arrangements, and the impact could be material
As part of the State of Texas re-bidding process, CCHCN obtained its own contract with the State of Texas to provide healthcare services to Medicaid recipients starting September 1, 2006
As a result, we may lose members based upon CCHCN’s contract with the State of Texas, and the impact could be material
In addition, under the risk-sharing arrangement with CCHCN that terminated as of August 31, 2005, the parties have an obligation to perform annual reconciliations and settlements of the risk pool for each contract year
We believe that CCHCN may owe us substantial payments for the 2004 and 2005 contract years which we estimate to be approximately dlra12dtta5 million as December 31, 2005
As of this date, we have not reached an agreement with CCHCN as to the settlement amounts for the 2004 and 2005 contract years
If we are unable to agree on a settlement, our health benefits expenses attributable to these periods may be adversely affected, and we may incur significant costs in our efforts to reach a final resolution of this matter
28 _________________________________________________________________ Our limited ability to predict our incurred medical expenses accurately has in the past and could in the future materially impact our reported results
Our medical expenses include estimates of claims that are yet to be received, or incurred but not reported (IBNR)
We estimate our IBNR medical expenses based on a number of factors, including authorization data, prior claims experience, maturity of markets, complexity and mix of products and stability of provider networks
Adjustments, if necessary, are made to medical expenses in the period during which the actual claim costs are ultimately determined or when underlying assumptions or factors used to estimate IBNR change
In addition to using our internal resources, we utilize the services of independent actuaries who are contracted on a routine basis to calculate and review the adequacy of our medical liabilities
We cannot be sure that our current or future IBNR estimates are adequate or that any further adjustments to such IBNR estimates will not harm or benefit our results of operations
Further, our inability to accurately estimate IBNR may also affect our ability to take timely corrective actions, further exacerbating the extent of the harm on our results
Though we employ our best efforts to estimate our IBNR at each reporting date, we can give no assurance that the ultimate results will not materially differ from our estimates resulting in a material increase or decrease in our health benefits expenses in the period such difference is determined
New products, such as SNP, or new markets, such as Georgia, could pose new and unexpected challenges to effectively predict medical costs
Difficulties in executing our acquisition strategy or integrating acquired business could adversely affect our business
Historically, acquisitions including the acquisition of Medicaid contract rights and related assets of other health plans, both in our existing service areas and in new markets, have been a significant factor in our growth
Although we cannot predict our rate of growth as the result of acquisitions with complete accuracy, we believe that acquisitions similar in nature to those we have historically executed will be important to our growth strategy
Many of the other potential purchasers of these assets have greater financial resources than we have
In addition, many of the sellers are interested in either (1) selling, along with their Medicaid assets, other assets in which we do not have an interest; or (2) selling their companies, including their liabilities, as opposed to just the assets of the ongoing business
Therefore, we cannot be sure that we will be able to complete acquisitions on terms favorable to us or that we can obtain the necessary financing for these acquisitions
We are currently evaluating potential acquisitions that would increase our membership, as well as acquisitions of complementary healthcare service businesses
These potential acquisitions are at various stages of consideration and discussion and we may enter into letters of intent or other agreements relating to these proposals at any time
However, we cannot predict when or whether we will actually acquire these businesses
We are generally required to obtain regulatory approval from one or more state agencies when making acquisitions
In the case of an acquisition of a business located in a state in which we do not currently operate, we would be required to obtain the necessary licenses to operate in that state
In addition, although we may already operate in a state in which we acquire a new business, we would be required to obtain the necessary licenses to operate in that state
In addition, although we may already operate in a state in which we acquire new business, we would be required to obtain additional regulatory approval if, as a result of the acquisition, we will operate in an area of the state in which we did not operate previously
There can be no assurance that we would be able to comply with these regulatory requirements for an acquisition in a timely manner, or at all
Our existing credit facility imposes certain restrictions on acquisitions
We may not be able to meet these restrictions
In addition to the difficulties we may face in identifying and consummating acquisitions, we will also be required to integrate our acquisitions with our existing operations
This may include the integration of: • additional employees who are not familiar with our operations, • existing provider networks, which may operate on different terms than our existing networks, • existing members, who may decide to switch to another healthcare provider, and • disparate information and record keeping systems
29 _________________________________________________________________ We may be unable to successfully identify, consummate and integrate future acquisitions, including integrating the acquired businesses on to our technology platform, or to implement our operations strategy in order to operate acquired businesses profitably
We also may be unable to obtain sufficient additional capital resources for future acquisitions
There can be no assurance that incurring expenses to acquire a business will result in the acquisition being consummated
These expenses could impact our selling, general and administrative expense ratio
If we are unable to effectively execute our acquisition strategy or integrate acquired businesses, our future growth will suffer and our results of operations could be harmed
Failure of a new business would negatively impact our results of operations
Start-up costs associated with a new business can be substantial
For example, in order to obtain a certificate of authority and obtain a state contract in most jurisdictions, we must first establish a provider network, have systems in place and demonstrate our ability to be able to process claims
If we were unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary license, winning the bid to provide service or attracting members in numbers sufficient to cover our costs, the new business would fail
We also could be obligated by the state to continue to provide services for some period of time without sufficient revenue to cover our ongoing costs or recover start-up costs
The costs associated with starting up the business could have a significant impact on our results of operations
In addition, if the new business does not operate at underwritten levels, our profitability could be harmed
Ineffective management of rapid growth or our inability to grow could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition and business
We have experienced rapid growth
In 1996, we had dlra22dtta9 million of premium revenue
In 2005, we had dlra2cmam311dtta6 million in premium revenue
This increase represents a compounded annual growth rate of 67dtta0prca
Depending on acquisition and other opportunities, we expect to continue to grow rapidly
Continued growth could place a significant strain on our management and on other resources
We anticipate that continued growth, if any, will require us to continue to recruit, hire, train and retain a substantial number of new and highly skilled medical, administrative, information technology, finance and other support personnel
Our ability to compete effectively depends upon our ability to implement and improve operational, financial and management information systems on a timely basis and to expand, train, motivate and manage our work force
If we continue to experience rapid growth, our personnel, systems, procedures and controls may be inadequate to support our operations, and our management may fail to anticipate adequately all demands that growth will place on our resources
In addition, due to the initial costs incurred upon the acquisition of new businesses, rapid growth could adversely affect our short-term profitability
Our inability to manage growth effectively or our inability to grow could have a negative impact on our business, operating results and financial condition
We are subject to competition that impacts our ability to increase our penetration of the markets that we serve
We compete for members principally on the basis of size and quality of provider network, benefits provided and quality of service
We compete with numerous types of competitors, including other health plans and traditional state Medicaid programs that reimburse providers as care is provided
Some of the health plans with which we compete have substantially larger enrollments, greater financial and other resources and offer a broader scope of products than we do
While many states mandate health plan enrollment for Medicaid eligible participants, the programs are voluntary in other states, such as Illinois
Subject to limited exceptions by federally approved state applications, the federal government requires that there be choice for Medicaid recipients among managed care programs
Voluntary programs and mandated competition will impact our ability to increase our market share
In addition, in most states in which we operate we are not allowed to market directly to potential members, and therefore, we rely on creating name brand recognition through our community-based programs
Where we have only recently entered a market or compete with health plans much larger than we are, we may be at a competitive disadvantage unless and until our community-based programs and other promotional activities create brand awareness
30 _________________________________________________________________ Restrictions and covenants in our credit facility could limit our ability to take actions
On May 10, 2005, we entered into an amendment (Amendment) to our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the Credit Agreement), which, among other things, provides for an increase in the commitments under our Credit Agreement then in existence to dlra150dtta0 million and a five-year extension of the term from the date of the Amendment
The Credit Agreement contains a provision which allows us to obtain, subject to certain conditions, an increase in revolving commitments of up to an additional dlra50dtta0 million
The proceeds of the Credit Agreement are available for general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, permitted acquisitions of businesses, assets and technologies
The borrowings under the Credit Agreement will accrue interest at one of the following rates, at our option: Eurodollar plus the applicable margin or an alternate base rate plus the applicable margin
The applicable margin for Eurodollar borrowings is between 0dtta875prca and 1dtta625prca and the applicable margin for alternate base rate borrowings is between 0dtta00prca and 0dtta75prca
The applicable margin will vary depending on our leverage ratio
The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, PHP Holdings, Inc, including the stock of their respective wholly-owned managed care subsidiaries
There is a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Credit Agreement that ranges from 0dtta20prca to 0dtta325prca, depending on the leverage ratio
The Credit Agreement terminates on May 10, 2010
As of December 31, 2005, there were no borrowings outstanding under our Credit Agreement
Events beyond our control, such as prevailing economic conditions and changes in the competitive environment, could impair our operating performance, which could affect our ability to comply with the terms of the Credit Agreement
Breaching any of the covenants or restrictions could result in the unavailability of the Credit Agreement or a default under the Credit Agreement
We can provide no assurance that our assets or cash flows will be sufficient to fully repay outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement or that we would be able to restructure such indebtedness on terms favorable to us
If we were unable to repay, refinance or restructure our indebtedness under the Credit Agreement, the lenders could proceed against the collateral securing the indebtedness
Our inability to maintain satisfactory relationships with providers would harm our profitability
Our profitability depends, in large part, upon our ability to contract on favorable terms with hospitals, physicians and other healthcare providers
Our provider arrangements with our primary care physicians and specialists usually are for one- to two-year periods and automatically renew for successive one-year terms, subject to termination by us for cause based on provider conduct or other appropriate reasons
The contracts generally may be canceled by either party upon 90 to 120 days prior written notice
Our contracts with hospitals are usually for one- to two-year periods and automatically renew for successive one-year periods, subject to termination for cause due to provider misconduct or other appropriate reasons
Generally, our hospital contracts may be canceled by either party without cause on 90 to 150 days prior written notice
There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to renew such contracts or enter into new contracts enabling us to service our members profitably
We will be required to establish acceptable provider networks prior to entering new markets
Although we have established long-term relationships with many of our providers, we may be unable to enter into agreements with providers in new markets on a timely basis or under favorable terms
If we are unable to retain our current provider contracts or enter into new provider contracts timely or on favorable terms, our profitability will be harmed
On occasion, our members obtain care from providers that are not in our network and with which we do not have contracts
We have generally reimbursed non-network providers at the rates paid to comparable network providers or at the applicable rate that the provider could have received under the traditional fee-for-service Medicaid program or at a discount therefrom
In some instances, we pay non-network providers pursuant to the terms of our contracts with the state
However, some non-network providers have requested that we pay them at their highest billing rate, or “full-billed charges
” Full-billed charges are significantly more than the amount the non-network providers could otherwise receive under the traditional fee-for-service Medicaid program
31 _________________________________________________________________ To the extent that non-network providers are successful in obtaining payment at rates in excess of the rates that we have historically paid to non-network providers, our profitability could be materially adversely affected
Negative publicity regarding the managed care industry may harm our business and operating results
This publicity has led to increased legislation, regulation, review of industry practices and private litigation in the commercial sector
These factors may adversely affect our ability to market our services, require us to change our services and increase the regulatory burdens under which we operate, further increasing the costs of doing business and adversely affecting our operating results
We may be subject to claims relating to medical malpractice, which could cause us to incur significant expenses
Our providers and employees involved in medical care decisions may be exposed to the risk of medical malpractice claims
Some states have passed or are considering legislation that permits managed care organizations to be held liable for negligent treatment decisions or benefits coverage determinations and or eliminate the requirement that certain providers carry a minimum amount of professional liability insurance
This kind of legislation has the effect of shifting the liability for medical decisions or adverse outcomes to the managed care organization
This could result in substantial damage awards against us and our providers that could exceed the limits of any applicable insurance coverage
Therefore, successful malpractice or tort claims asserted against us, our providers or our employees could adversely affect our financial condition and profitability
In addition, we may be subject to other litigation that may adversely affect our business or results of operations
We maintain errors and omissions insurance and such other lines of coverage as we believe are reasonable in light of our experience to date
However, this insurance may not be sufficient or available at a reasonable cost to protect us from liabilities that might adversely affect our business or results of operations
Even if any claims brought against us were unsuccessful or without merit, we would still have to defend ourselves against such claims
Any such defenses may be time-consuming and costly, and may distract our management’s attention
As a result, we may incur significant expenses and may be unable to effectively operate our business
Changes in the number of Medicaid eligibles, or benefits provided to Medicaid eligibles or a change in mix of Medicaid eligibles could cause our operating results to suffer
Historically, the number of persons eligible to receive Medicaid benefits has increased more rapidly during periods of rising unemployment, corresponding to less favorable general economic conditions
However, during such economic downturns, state budgets could decrease, causing states to attempt to cut healthcare programs, benefits and rates
If this were to happen while our membership was increasing, our results of operations could suffer
Conversely, the number of persons eligible to receive Medicaid benefits may grow more slowly or even decline if economic conditions improve, thereby causing our operating results to suffer
In either case, in the event that the Company experiences a change in product mix to less profitable product lines, our profitability could be negatively impacted
Changes in SCHIP rules restricting eligibility could cause our operating results to suffer
The states in which we operate have experienced budget deficits in the past
In Florida and Texas, the rules governing SCHIP have either recently changed, or may change in the near future, to restrict or limit eligibility for benefits through the imposition of waiting periods, enrollment caps and/or new or increased co-payments
These changes in SCHIP eligibility could cause us to experience a net loss in SCHIP membership
If the states in which we operate continue to restrict or limit SCHIP eligibility, our operating results could suffer
32 _________________________________________________________________ Our inability to integrate, manage and grow our information systems effectively could disrupt our operations
Our operations are significantly dependent on effective information systems
The information gathered and processed by our information systems assists us in, among other things, monitoring utilization and other cost factors, processing provider claims and providing data to our regulators
Our providers also depend upon our information systems for membership verifications, claims status and other information
In November 2003, we signed a software licensing agreement for FACETS During 2005, we continued to invest in the implementation and testing of FACETS with a staggered conversion to FACETS by health plan beginning in 2005 and continuing through 2007
As of October 1, 2005, claims payments for our Texas health plan are processed using FACETS We estimate that our current claims payment systems, without FACETS, could be at full capacity within the next 16 months
We currently expect that FACETS will meet our software needs and will support our long-term growth strategies
However, if we cannot execute a successful system conversion, our operations could be disrupted, which would have a negative impact on our profitability and our ability to grow could be harmed
Our information systems and applications require continual maintenance, upgrading and enhancement to meet our operational needs
Moreover, our acquisition activity requires frequent transitions to or from, and the integration of, various information systems
We are continually upgrading and expanding our information systems capabilities
If we experience difficulties with the transition to or from information systems or are unable to properly maintain or expand our information systems, we could suffer, among other things, from operational disruptions, loss of existing members and difficulty in attracting new members, regulatory problems and increases in administrative expenses
For example, we acquired our New York health plan as of January 1, 2005, that uses TXEN, an information system that is different from those used by the rest of our business
We expect to continue using this system exclusively for our New York plan until such time as the New York subsidiary can be successfully integrated onto FACETS Operating that system as a separate information system can be expected to increase our costs in the short-term, and there is no assurance that we can effect a seamless transition of the New York plan to our new system
Both the increased operational costs of this system and any difficulties in conversion to a new system could have a negative impact on our profitability
Acts of terrorism, natural disasters and medical epidemics could cause our business to suffer
Our profitability depends, to a significant degree, on our ability to predict and effectively manage medical costs
If an act or acts of terrorism or a natural disaster (such as a major hurricane) or a medical epidemic were to occur in markets in which we operate, our business could suffer
The results of terrorist acts or natural disasters could lead to higher than expected medical costs, network and information technology disruptions, and other related factors beyond our control, which would cause our business to suffer
A widespread epidemic in a market could cause a breakdown in the medical care delivery system which could cause our business to suffer
We are currently involved in litigation, and may become involved in future litigation, which may result in substantial expense and may divert our attention from our business
We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings and, from time to time, we may be subject to additional legal claims
We may suffer an unfavorable outcome as a result of one or more claims, resulting in the depletion of valuable capital to pay defense costs or the costs associated with any resolution of such matters
Depending on the costs of litigation and the amount and timing of any unfavorable resolution of claims against us, our future results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected
In addition, we may be subject to securities class action litigation
When the market price of a stock has been volatile, regardless of whether such fluctuations are related to the operating performance of a particular company, holders of that stock have sometimes initiated securities class action litigation against such company
Any class action litigation against us could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert the time and attention of our management and other resources, or otherwise harm our business